Publications

Journal Articles

* indicates student mentee

26 Faber, N. S., Savulescu, J., & Van Lange, P. A. M. (2016). Reputational concerns as a general determinant of group functioning. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 39. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X15001363
contact me for a copy
25 Wittmann, M. K., Kolling, N., Faber, N. S., Scholl, J., Nelissen, N., & Rushworth, M. F. S. (2016). Self-other-mergence in frontal cortex during cooperation and competition. Neuron, 91, 482–493. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2016.06.022
download pdf (open access)
24 Häusser, J. A., Leder, J., Ketturat, C., Dresler, M., & Faber, N. S. (2016). Sleep deprivation and advice taking. Scientific Reports, 6, 24386. doi: 10.1038/srep24386
download pdf (open access)
23 Faber, N. S., Savulescu, J., & Douglas, T. (2016). Why is cognitive enhancement deemed unacceptable? The role of fairness, deservingness, and hollow achievements. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 232. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00232
download pdf (open access) / Part of Special Issue ‘Using Substances to Enhance Performance: A Psychology of Neuroenhancement
22 Faber, N. S., Häusser, J. A., & Kerr, N. L. (2015). Sleep deprivation impairs and caffeine enhances my performance, but not always our performance: How acting in a group can change the effects of impairments and enhancements. Personality and Social Psychology Review. Advance online publication. doi: 10.1177/1088868315609487
download pdf (open access)
 21 *Everett, J. A. C., *Caviola, L., Kahane, G., Savulescu, J., & Faber, N. S. (2015). Doing good by doing nothing? The role of social norms in explaining default effects in altruistic contexts. European Journal of Social Psychology, 45, 230-241. doi: 10.1002/ejsp.2080
download pdf (open access)
 20 *Caviola, L., & Faber, N. S. (2015) Pills or push-ups? Effectiveness and public perception of pharmacological and non-pharmacological cognitive enhancement. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 1852. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01852
download pdf (open access) / Part of Special Issue ‘Using Substances to Enhance Performance: A Psychology of Neuroenhancement
19 *Everett, J. A. C., Faber, N. S., Crockett, M. J., & De Dreu, C. K. W. (2015) Economic games and social neuroscience methods can help elucidate the psychology of parochial altruism. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 861. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00861
download pdf (open access) / Part of Special Issue ‘Parochial Altruism: Pitfalls and Prospects
18 Wölfer, R., Faber, N. S., & Hewstone, M. (2015). Social network analysis in the science of groups. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 19, 45-61. doi: 10.1037/gdn0000021
download pdf
17 *Everett, J. A. C., Faber, N. S., & Crockett, M. J. (2015). The influence of social preferences and reputational concerns on intergroup prosocial behaviour in gains and losses contexts. Royal Society Open Science, 2, 150546. doi: 10.1098/rsos.150546
download pdf (open access)
16 Faber, N. S., Douglas, T., *Heise, F., & Hewstone, M. (2015). Cognitive enhancement and motivation enhancement – An empirical comparison of intuitive judgments. AJOB Neuroscience, 13, 18-20. doi: 10.1080/21507740.2014.991847
download pdf
15 *Everett, J. A. C., Faber, N. S., & Crockett, M. J. (2015). Preferences and beliefs in ingroup favoritism. Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience, 9, 15. doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2015.00015
download pdf (open access) / Part of Special Issue ‘Prosocial and Antisocial Behavior in Economic Games
14 *Caviola, L., *Mannino, A., Savulescu, J., & Faulmüller, N. (2014). Cognitive biases can affect moral intuitions about cognitive enhancement. Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience, 8, 195. doi: 10.3389/fnsys.2014.00195
download pdf (open access) / Part of Special Issue ‘Augmentation of Brain Function: Facts, Fiction and Controversy
13 Mojzisch, A., Kerschreiter, R., Faulmüller, N., Vogelgesang, F., & Schulz-Hardt, S. (2014). The consistency principle in interpersonal communication: Consequences of preference confirmation and disconfirmation in collective decision-making. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 106, 961-977. doi: 10.1037/a0036338
download pdf
12 *Caviola, L., & Faulmüller, N. (2014). Moral hypocrisy in economic games — How prosocial behavior is shaped by social expectations. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 897. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00897
download pdf (open access)
11 Maslen, H., Faulmüller, N., & Savulescu, J. (2014). Pharmacological cognitive enhancement – How neuroscientific research could advance ethical debate. Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience, 8, 107. doi: 10.3389/fnsys.2014.00107
download pdf (open access) / Part of Special Issue ‘Augmentation of Brain Function: Facts, Fiction and Controversy
10 *Caviola, L., Faulmüller, N., *Everett, J. A. C., Savulescu, J., & Kahane, G. (2014). The evaluability bias in charitable giving: Saving administration costs or saving lives? Judgment and Decision Making, 9, 303-315.
download pdf (open access)
9 *Schelle, K. J., Faulmüller, N., *Caviola, L., & Hewstone, M. (2014). Attitudes towards pharmacological cognitive enhancement – a review. Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience, 8, 53. doi: 10.3389/fnsys.2014.00053
download pdf (open access) / Part of Special Issue ‘Augmentation of Brain Function: Facts, Fiction and Controversy
8 Santoni de Sio, F., Faulmüller, N., & Vincent, N. A. (2014). How cognitive enhancement can change our duties. Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience, 8, 131. doi: 10.3389/fnsys.2014.00131
download pdf (open access) / Part of Special Issue ‘Augmentation of Brain Function: Facts, Fiction and Controversy
7 Faulmüller, N., Maslen, H., & Santoni de Sio, F. (2013). The indirect psychological costs of cognitive enhancement. The American Journal of Bioethics, 13, 45-47. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2013.794880
download pdf
6 Faulmüller, N., Mojzisch, A., Kerschreiter, R., & Schulz-Hardt, S. (2012). Do you want to convince me or to be understood? Preference-consistent information sharing and its motivational determinants. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 38, 1684–1696. doi: 10.1177/0146167212458707
download pdf
5 Santoni de Sio, F., Maslen, H., & Faulmüller, N. (2012). The necessity of objective standards for moral enhancement. AJOB Neuroscience, 3, 15-16. doi: 10.1080/21507740.2012.721855
download pdf
4 Faulmüller, N., Kerschreiter, R., Mojzisch, A., & Schulz-Hardt, S. (2010). Beyond group-level explanations for the failure of groups to solve hidden profiles: The individual preference effect revisited. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 13, 653–671. doi: 10.1177/1368430210369143
download pdf

Peer-reviewed Book Chapters & Magazine Articles

3 Santoni de Sio, F., Faber, N. S., Savulescu, J., & Vincent, N. A. (2016). Why less praise for enhanced performance? Moving beyond responsibility-shifting, authenticity, and cheating, towards a nature-of-activities approach. In F. Jotterand & V. Dubljevic (Eds.), Cognitive Enhancement: Ethical and Policy Implications in International Perspectives (pp. 27-41). Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199396818.003.0003
contact me for a copy
2 Maslen, H., Santoni de Sio, F., & Faber, N. S. (2015). With cognitive enhancement comes great responsibility?. In B.-J. Koops, I. Oosterlaken, H. Romijn, T. Swierstra, & J. van den Hoven (Eds.), Responsible Innovation 2 – Concepts, Approaches, and Applications (pp. 121-138). Cham (Switzerland): Springer International Publishing. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-17308-5_7
download pdf
1 *Caviola, L., & Faber, N. S. (2014). How stress influences our morality. In-Mind Magazine, 23.
download pdf (open access)